The name of the movie is "Ek Ruka Hua Faisla". As a storm rages outside, the atmosphere inside the room becomes no less stormy, with people shouting at each other and even getting violent as shown by Juror #3 who lunges at Juror #8 yelling, “I will kill you”. Each title is ranked according to its share of pageviews among the items displayed. It is a remake of the Golden Bear winning, American motion picture 12 Angry Men (1957), which was directed by Sidney Lumet , the film in turn was an adaptation from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose . The story also featuring a jury trial came to great prominence in 1959 owing to a real life case of Nanavati vs State of Maharashtra in India in which Commander KM Nanavati was accused of attempt to murder of his wife’s lover, Prem Ahuja. The rest of the film centers around the jury's difficulty in reaching a unanimous verdict. Increasingly impatient, Juror 7 changes his vote just so that the deliberation may end, which earns him nothing but shame. Through this time, Juror #8 stands firm on his conviction that the evidence to proclaim the boy guilty is not enough. The only dissenters left are Jurors 3, 4 (S. M. Zaheer), and 10 (Subbiraj). The judge further informs them that a guilty verdict will be accompanied by a mandatory death sentence.The twelve-man jury retires to a private room, where they spend a short while getting acquainted before they begin deliberating. But in the midst of all this he also directed Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (1986) and Kamala’s Death (1989), which were based on social and moral issues. But in the midst of all this he also directed Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (1986) and Kamala’s Death (1989), which were based on social and moral issues. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla ( is a Bollywood film of 1986, directed by Basu Chatterjee. The Judge instructs the Jury to come with a decision on whether they find the boy guilty of the crime. When 4 states that he doesn't believe the boy's alibi, which was being at the movies with a few friends at the time of the murder, 8 test how well 4 can remember the events of previous days. There are heated discussions among the jury members, their own biases influencing their sense of judgement and with every round of voting, the ambiguity in their opinions. and starts lunging at 8, but is restrained by two others. Like their films, his films often put light-hearted stories of middle-class families in an urban setting that focused on matrimonial and love affairs. Engrossing fare. Pankaj Kapoor delivers the best performance of the lot. Like their films, his films often put light-hearted stories of middle-class families in an urban setting that focused on matrimonial and love affairs. The jury consists of 12 members and they don’t necessarily have a legal background. As these plots unravel, reality mixes with fiction. If there is even an iota of the doubt for the innocence of the victim, the judge cannot pronounce judgment against him. He takes a bold gamble: He requests another vote, this time by secret ballot. (Under Development). The rest of the film centers around the jury's difficulty in reaching a unanimous verdict. Jurors 3 and 8 conduct an experiment to see if it's possible for a shorter person to stab downward into a taller person. Soon afterward, Juror 11 (Shailendra Goel) questions whether the defendant would have reasonably fled the scene and come back three hours later to retrieve the knife, then also changes his vote. Juror 2 calls into question the prosecution's claim that the accused, who was nearly a foot shorter than the victim, was able to stab him in such a way as to inflict the downward stab wound found on the body. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a 1986 Hindi film directed by Basu Chatterjee. Twelve male members of a jury gather together in an enclosed room to deliberate their decision on a charge of murder against a young man who has been accused of killing his elderly father. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (Devanagari: एक रुका हुआ फैसला, (English: A Pending Decision )) is a 1986 Hindi film, directed by Basu Chatterjee. Final closing arguments have been presented, and the judge then instructs the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty of murder, which carries a mandatory death sentence. As long as 12 people of 12 are on one side, the decision cannot be taken. To prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution is a requisite in the Criminal Justice System. Punishment of a delinquent defendant requires proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Listen...!" Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles. Introduction : Ek Ruka Hua Faisla ( एक रुका हुआ फैसला ) is a Bollywood film of 1986, directed by Basu Chatterjee. The film depicts an adapted closed room drama of a murder trial where one dissenting juror in a murder trial tries to influence the verdict with his personal prejudices and biases. But Basu Chatterjee made this film come alive by putting the Indian milieu in perspective. One dissenting juror in a murder trial tries to influence the verdict with his personal prejudices and biases. It is only a menial task for them to somehow quickly get rid of and return to their busy lives. We've To Understand China Threat": Trump's Son, Serum Institute, Bharat Biotech To Start Intranasal Vaccine Tests: Centre. Then firstly, the counsel for both the Parties presents their case in front of the Jury and then Jury takes it time to decide the case and pronounce judgment. https://www.filmcompanion.in/features/bollywood-features/basu-chatterjees-gentle-middle-of-the-road-cinema-was-that-of-the-people-next-door-baradwaj-rangan/amp/, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ek_Ruka_Hua_Faisla&oldid=968032927, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 16 July 2020, at 20:17. Rajlokhi O Srikanto (2019) is a Bengali feature film directed by Pradipta Bhattacharyya is a cinematic adaptation of the Saratchandra Chattopadhyay’s four-part novel narrating the life of a drifter named Srikanto. There are more aspects to this movie which makes this movie a must-watch for anyone, who wants to know the nuances of the law. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? How will they decide the punishment? The movie shows what later ensues. Juror 8 takes him to task, calling him a "self-appointed public avenger" and a sadist, saying he wants the defendant to die purely for personal reasons rather than the facts. While several of the jurors harbor personal prejudices, Juror 8 maintains that the evidence presented in the case is circumstantial, and that the boy deserves a fair deliberation. Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Once inside the Jury discussion room, it is immediately apparent that all jurors with the sole exception of Juror Number 8 (K.K.